On 11/12/12 01:57, Carter Schonwald wrote: > Michael, I think that calls for a type-class! > (though I imagine theres a slicker way of writing it) >
I'm already using typeclasses, but there's still a bit of boilerplate. I could probably think of something more clever myself, but like I said, these are just one-off experiments, and I'm lazy. So I'm hoping fixed-vector will do it for me! _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe