On 11/12/12 01:57, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> Michael, I think that calls for a type-class! 
> (though I imagine theres a slicker way of writing it)
> 

I'm already using typeclasses, but there's still a bit of boilerplate. I
could probably think of something more clever myself, but like I said,
these are just one-off experiments, and I'm lazy. So I'm hoping
fixed-vector will do it for me!


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to