If some person or group of people is willing to administer and maintain
windows build/testing boxes for the good of the Haskell community
(perhaps even just for core infrastructure and an extended set of
"blessed" libraries), I would be willing to contribute a decent sum to
the procurement of these machines. I'm sure I am far from alone in this.
It would be a very good use of our community resources to co-ordinate
such efforts.
Cheers,
Gershom
On 11/20/12 9:21 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
+1 to this. The friction of finding, setting up, and using Windows
isn't even comparable to just sshing into another unix box and testing
something quickly.
As a university student, I also find it relatively rare that I get to
test on a Windows machine. My personal computer runs linux, my
technical friends run linux or osx, and my non-technical ones run osx.
Also, all the school servers that I have access to run either FreeBSD
or Linux.
If I want to run something on linux system, I have about 40 different
computers that I can ssh into and run code on.
If I want to run something on osx, I just have to call a friend and
ask if they can turn on their computer and allow me to ssh in (to my
own account, of course).
If I want to run something on Windows, I have to track down a friend
(in person!), ask to borrow their computer for a few hours, get
administrator access to install the Haskell Platform, get frustrated
that HP hasn't been upgraded to 7.6, and give up.
It's just not practical, especially for the large amount of small
(<500 LOC) packages on Hackage.
- Clark
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo
<mle...@mega-nerd.com <mailto:mle...@mega-nerd.com>> wrote:
Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
> Clearly, since >90% of computers have Windows, it should be
trivial to
> find one to test on, if a programmer wants to. Surely every
programmer
> is surrounded by Windows-using family and friends? (Perhaps to the
> programmer's dismay, too, because the perpetual "I've got a
virus again,
> can you help?" is so annoying?) We are not talking about BeOS.
>
> Therefore, if programmers do not test on Windows, it is because
they do
> not want to.
I have been an open source contributor for over 15 years. All the
general
purpose machines in my house run Linux. My father's and my
mother-in-law's
computers also run Linux (easier for me to provide support). For
testing
software, I have a PowerPC machine and virtual machines running
various
versions of Linux, FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
What I don't have is a windows machine. I have, at numerous times,
spent
considerable amounts of time (and even real money for licenses)
setting
up (or rather trying to) windows in a VM and it is *always*
considerably
more work to set up, maintain and fix when something goes wrong.
Setting
up development tools is also a huge pain in the ass. And sooner or
later
they fail in some way I can't fix and I have to start again. Often its
not worth the effort.
At my day job we have on-demand windows VMs, but I am not officially
allowed (nor do I intend to start) to use those resources for my open
source work.
So is it difficult for an open source contributor to test on windows?
Hell yes! You have no idea how hard windows is in comparison to say
FreeBSD. Even Apple's OS X is easier than windows, because I have
friends who can give me SSH access to their machines.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org <mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org>
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
