On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Since I have very little experience with Haskell and am not used to > Haskell-think yet, I don't quite understand your statement that regexes are > seen as foreign to Haskell-think. Could you elaborate? What would a more > "native" solution look like? From what I have learned so far, it seems to > me that Haskell is a lot about clear, > The native solution is a parser like parsec/attoparsec. The problem with regexes is that you can't at compile time verify that, for example, you have as many matching groups in the regex as the code using it expects, nor does an optional matching group behave as a Maybe like it should; nor are there nice ways to recover. A parser gives you full control and better compile time checking, and is generally recommended. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
