in addition to atom http://hackage.haskell.org/package/atom/
theres also copilot http://hackage.haskell.org/package/copilot point being: theres lots of great tools you can use to target embedded systems that leverage haskell in cool ways! (eg: hArduino on the more hobbyist side, which I need to check out myself! ) enjoy your explorations! -Carter On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Jeremy Shaw <jer...@n-heptane.com> wrote: > Ah, nice. Building Haskell applications on the Raspberry Pi which is a > 32-bit 700 Mhz CPU with 512MB of RAM is still pretty painful. So, I > think that running GHC on something even less powerful is probably not > going to work well. But, handling a subset of Haskell for onsite > programming could work. Using Haskell Source Extensions and the new > Haskell Type Extensions should be enough to allow you to create an > onboard mini-Haskell interpreter? It would actually be pretty neat to > be able to extend all sorts of Haskell applications with a > Haskell-subset scripting language.. > > I'd definitely be interested in exploring this more. I recently got > into multirotors and I am also working on a semi-autonomous rover > project -- plus I just want to see Haskell used more in educational > robotics (http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/RoboticOverlords). > > - jeremy > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jeremy Shaw <jer...@n-heptane.com> > wrote: > >> Another option would be to use Atom. I have successfully used it to > >> target the arduino platform before. Running the entire OS on the > >> embedded system seems dubious. Assuming you are using something the 9x > >> family of transmitters -- they are slow and have very little internal > >> memory. Plus trying to programming using a 6 buttons would be a royal > >> pain. If you really want in-field programming, then you might at least > >> using a raspberry pi with a small bluetooth keyboard and have it > >> upload to the transmitter. > > > > Atom does look interesting. Thanks for the pointer. > > > > The target transmitter is the Walkera Devo line. These have much more > > capable CPUs than the various 9x boards: 32 bit ARMs at 72MHz with > > comparable amounts of storage. Some have 9x-like screen/button > > combos, others have touch screens. The deviationTx software runs on > > all of them. > > > > Settings are stored in a FAT file system that can be accessed as a USB > > drive. I'm thinking that a traditional configuration interface on the > > transmitter, storing the config information as program text. The only > > actual programming would be done by replacing the virtual > > channel/switch feature with expressions or short programs. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe