On 25 Feb 2013, at 11:14, Oliver Charles wrote:
> Obvious question: How does this compare to cassava? Especially cassava's
> Data.CSV.Incremental module? I specifically ask because you mention that it's
> " It is lazier, faster, more space-efficient, and more flexible in its
> treatment of errors, than any other extant Haskell CSV library on Hackage"
> but there is no mention of cassava in the website.
Simple answer - I have never heard of cassava, and suspect it did not exist
when I first did the benchmarking. I'd be happy to re-do my performance
comparison, including cassava and any other recent-ish CSV libraries, if I can
find them.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe