On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Johan Tibell <[email protected]>wrote:
> > There are some blog posts and comments out there about merging cereal >> and binary, is this what's the goal/going on (cfr runGetIncremental)? >> > > It's most definitely the goal and it's basically done. The only thing I > don't think we'll adopt from cereal is the instances from container types. > Why not? Those instances are useful. Without instances defined in binary/cereal, pretty much every Happstack (or, better said, every ixset/acidstate/safecopy stack) user will have to have orphan instances. Also, cereal has a generic instance. Will the new binary?
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
