On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Carlos Camarao <carlos.cama...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Sorry, I think my sentence: > "To define (+) as an overloaded operator in Haskell, > you have to define and use a type class." > is not quite correct. I meant that to define any operator in Haskell you > have to > have a type class defined with that operator as member. > What? An operator is just an infix function, taken from the set of symbols. Any function can be an operator (and is, via `func` syntax). No typeclass is required to define a random operator. What did you really mean to say there? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
