On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Richard Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Normal "let":
> In a function (which does not use "do"), you can use "let" to make local
> variables. The word "in" separates the local variable declaration from the
> part of your function where you want to use that variable. Loosely
> translating from Haskell to C++:
>
> Haskell:
> > let foo = bar in baz
>
> C++:
> > /* insert correct type here */ foo = bar;
> > baz
>
>
For the C++, I'd say
> {
> /* insert correct type here */ foo = bar;
> baz
> }
for let ... in, whereas let without in (only permitted in do notation)
discards those braces.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
