On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, gs <volderm...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Brandon Allbery <allbery.b <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > ... which means that implementers should be free to "fix" data type
> contexts
> > however they like, as they are now complier extensions which won't
> conflict
> > with standard Haskell.
> >
> > Except that people do build older programs with newer Haskell compilers,
> and it's bad to "repurpose" a syntax like that because it leads to strange
> errors.
> "Remembering" data type contexts shouldn't break existing code, unless it's
> semantically broken already. (I'm sure that anyone could come up with a
> theoretical example of code which would break

These statements are contradictory.

> - but would it break any
> real-world code?)

I do not support that criterion.  We use theory to ENSURE that no
real-world code will break.
Haskell-Cafe mailing list

Reply via email to