On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote: > The case of WASH is a pity. Architecturally It was more advanced that many > recent haskell web frameworks. The package would have been a success with > little changes in the DSL syntax.
Could you briefly summarise the difference between WASH's approach and that of the more recent frameworks? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
