I wish it was possible to use an extension CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
In the cabal file 2013/5/23 Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> > I liked Andreas's idea (cited below). Hence the new package > prelude-prime. > > https://github.com/feuerbach/prelude-prime > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/prelude-prime > > Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes > (like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reasons why > other Preludes haven't been adopted is because they were too radical. > > Let's see whether people here can put their code where their mouth is :) > > Roman > > * Andreas Abel <andreas.a...@ifi.lmu.de> [2013-05-20 13:26:05+0200] > > Maybe instead of fiddling with the current Prelude (which might break > > backwards compatibility), we should design a new prelude which is not > > automatically loaded but contains roughly the current prelude (with > > the list functions generalized to collections) plus the "modern" type > > class stack: Functor, Applicative, Monad, Foldable, Traversable, > > Monoid etc. > > > > I am willing to write > > > > {-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude #-} > > import Base > > > > if I get a decent, "modern" standard set of functions that could be > > considered as the base vocabulary of modern Haskell programmers... > > > > I just do not want to think about the democratic process involved in > > this design... > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
