Oh, never mind. In this case, I guess I don't need an extension at all! On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Chris Smith <cdsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, yes. That looks great! Also seems to work with OverloadedStrings > in the natural way in GHC 7.6, although that isn't documented. > > Now if only it didn't force NoImplicitPrelude, since I really want to > -hide-package base and -package my-other-prelude. Even adding > -XImplicitPrelude doesn't help. > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Aleksey Khudyakov > <alexey.sklad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 08.07.2013 23:54, Chris Smith wrote: >>> >>> So I've been thinking about something, and I'm curious whether anyone >>> (in particular, people involved with GHC) think this is a worthwhile >>> idea. >>> >>> I'd like to implement an extension to GHC to offer a different >>> behavior for literals with polymorphic types. The current behavior is >>> something like: >>> >> Probably RebidableSyntax[1] could work for you. From description it >> allows to change meaning of literals. >> >> [1] >> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.6.3/html/users_guide/syntax-extns.html#rebindable-syntax >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
