Michael Snoyman <mich...@snoyman.com> wrote: > Any thoughts on this? I'm not sure exactly what would be the right > method to add to the Exception typeclass, but if we can come to > consensus on that and there are no major objections to my separate > package proposal, I think this would be something moving forward on, > including a library proposal.
Just a minor note: Add both `hasTag` and `tagsOf` to the type class, because `hasTag` may use something much more efficient than `elem` like pattern matching or `Data.Set.member`. I'm not even sure we really need `tagsOf`. Greets, Ertugrul -- Key-ID: E5DD8D11 "Ertugrul Soeylemez <e...@ertes.de>" FPrint: BD28 3E3F BE63 BADD 4157 9134 D56A 37FA E5DD 8D11 Keysrv: hkp://subkeys.pgp.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
