On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:47 AM, <o...@okmij.org> wrote:
>
> Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> > It just changes forgetting to use different variable names because of
> > recursion (which is currently uniform throughout the language) to
> > forgetting to use non recursive let instead of let.
>
> Let me bring to the record the message I just wrote on Haskell-cafe
>
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2013-July/109116.html
>
> and repeat the example:
>
> In OCaml, I can (and often do) write
>
> let (x,s) = foo 1 [] in
> let (y,s) = bar x s in
> let (z,s) = baz x y s in ...
>
> In Haskell I'll have to uniquely number the s's:
>
> let (x,s1) = foo 1 [] in
> let (y,s2) = bar x s1 in
> let (z,s3) = baz x y s2 in ...
>
> and re-number them if I insert a new statement.
>
blah = case foo 1 [] of
(x, s) -> case bar x s of
(y, s) -> case baz x y s of
(z, s) -> ...
-Edward
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
