On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Vlatko Basic <vlatko.ba...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The problem here isn't quite what you think it is; (==) is not a
> constructor, therefore it is a *variable*. It's exactly the same problem as
>
> a = 5
> -- ...
> foo a = 3 -- this does NOT compare with the previous value of "a";
> it's identical to the next line!
> foo x = x
>
> Hm, I thought it is a pattern match with constant, as in f ('a':xs) ==
>
I wonder what you'd make of this definition, then?
(*) `on` f = \x y -> f x * f y
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
