On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:57:59PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> This all works great, except that when there's 20 or so options, I
> duplicate a ton of code in the definition of OptionalCfg. Is there some
> pre-existing solution that will let me take a Cfg and create a new type
> with Cfg's fields wrapped in Maybe?
You can always try
data Cfg f = Cfg { verbose :: f Bool }
and set f to Maybe or Identity depending on what you use it for. It will be
slightly notationally cumbersome to extract values from the Identity functor
though.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
