Hi Roman, > However, the decision to use Attoparsec (instead of Parsec, say) > strikes me as a bit odd, as it wasn't intended for parsing source > code. In particular, I'm concerned with error messages this parser > would produce.
In addition to what Mateusz already said, I want to briefly summarize my justification for using Attoparsec: * Attoparsec's backtracking behavior is much easier to work with than Parsec's * There is no such thing as a parse error in Markdown, and I think we should try to make this true for Haddock markup, too Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
