On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 05:59:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I liked the concept of UT in Clean, but I haven't ever got comfortable > > with using it to write real programs. > > Clean-like _explicit_ uniqueness typing is not what I'm asking for in Haskell.
So you want implicit, automatically inferred uniqueness typing - something that would be even more fragile and sensitive then current Haskell's space problems arising from laziness? ;-) > It might be possible to get extremely fast code out of ghc, but as an > overall impression, it's not easy, whilst Clean sort of gives it for > granted (well, struggeling with wrongly assigned uniqueness attributes > aside). Well, C sort of gives it for granted too, because it is very difficult to write inefficient, simple, specification-like code. I want to be able to write simple and elegant code, even if it is inefficient! Best regards Tomasz -- I am searching for a programmer who is good at least in some of [Haskell, ML, C++, Linux, FreeBSD, math] for work in Warsaw, Poland _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
