On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:57:14AM -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote: > Or if we're going to allow @ as an infix operator, we could use (@ > pat), reminiscent of section notation. (exp @) of course would make no > sense, seeing as there's no representation for patterns as values.
oooh. I like that. what fixity do you think @ should have? perhaps even lower than $... John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe