Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:36:06PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Udo Stenzel wrote:
(*>) :: Monad m => m a -> m b -> m a
m *> n = do a <- m ; n ; return a
Right, that one is really useful. I named it (<<), though, conforming to
(>>=) versus (=<<).
But =<< first executes the second argument...
... so much to striking symbolic identifiers. (In fact, I've never used
=<<.)
Christian
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
