G'day all. Quoting Robert Dockins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ewwwwww! Be careful how far you depend on properties of typeclasses, and make > sure you document it when you do. The behaviour of NaN actually makes perfect sense when you realise that it is Not a Number. Things that are not numbers are incomparable with things that are. Yes, NaN can be of type Float. But it's not a Float. Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
