--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1:_|_
is certainly finite.  In what sense is it not?

I see that point. I have
been using "finite" as, by convention, equal to "total and finite". And so
have others. As always with convention, one can argue. I won't, of course.


> Sorry, see my reply to Bill Wood. 

Yes, saw that later.

> distinguishes
what are called "interesting" elements from other elements 
> (if I recall
the terminology correctly).

Interesting ;-)

Ciao, Janis.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to