Hello Krasimir, Friday, June 30, 2006, 2:26:53 PM, you wrote:
> In the last section you said that IO has the same definition in GHC > and Hugs. As far as I can remember in Hugs IO is defined as: > newtype IO a = IO ((a -> IOResult) -> (IOError -> IOResult) -> IOResult) > Of course this definition is builtin and cann't be seen in the Haskell > source code. i'm not sure about this - can this be considered as an example of this RealWorld strategy or not. Feel free to edit text if you know the right answer -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
