1.)
        I know I can use
                Build-Depends:   lib == <version>, lib2 < version, lib3 >= 
version
        and so on.

        Do you think it would be useful to introducue some notation to indicate
        a "tested with" ?

        Reason, purpose: I think its sometimes the case that a author/ mantainer
        is quite busy with other projects and misses that some dependencies
        break things.. If you want to try out you're left with some compiler
        errors and a dependency and have to try out which version works.

        I would propose using this syntax:
                lib-1.3 >=1.1 
        to indicate that lib 1.1 is required at leeast and tested with up to
        1.3.. Cabal might then give a warning if you try to use 1.4 or greater
        "using newer version than tested" or similar..

        What do you think?
        Would this be useful?

2.)
        Is there a ghci target?
        I find it quite useful using ghci to debug test/ check types
        functions of single modules...

        My hack is using a Setup.hs file like this adding ./setup ghci 
        which runs ghci and adds all dependency as -pakcage arguments:

                module Main where
                import Distribution.Simple
                import Distribution.Simple.Configure 
                import System
                import System.Process
                import System.Exit
                import Monad

                main= do
                  args <- getArgs -- check args to launch ghci
                  when (length args > 0) $ do
                    when ((args!!0) == "ghci") $ do
                        lbi <- getPersistBuildConfig
                        let packageArgs = (concat.concat) [ [" -package ", 
showPackageId pkg] | pkg <- packageDeps lbi ]
                        system("ghci " ++ packageArgs)
                        exitWith ExitSuccess
                  defaultMain -- fallback to defaultMain

        Would this be useful for you, too?

Marc W.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to