Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Matthias Fischmann wrote:
The trick is that Int is not the only index data type, but tuples of
index data types are, too. Do this:
| type Point = (State, State, Int)
| type TypeV = Array State Double
|
| matrix :: TypeV
| matrix = array bounds values
| where
| ...
Surely you meant to say
| type TypeV = Array Point Double
True, I did make that mistake.
Cheers,
Ben
And
type Value = Double
newtype PointNat = PointNat Int deriving (...Ix)
type Point = (State,State,PointNat)
Or even
type TypeVof a = Array PointNat a
type TypeV = TypeVof Value
I did not even run the code I wrote through ghci, I was just showing what
it could look like.
And stop calling me Shirley.
Dear Chris,
Could you please be a bit more explicit? Have I offended anyone? Or else,
how do I have to understand this comment other than as a rebuke? And how
comes you answer this as if you were the one who posted the code, and not a
person named Matthias Fischmann?
Sorry for the misunderstanding. No one has been offended or given offense.
The Surely/Shirley is a reference to the classic 1980 motion picture "Airplane!"
in which the humor includes a repeated motif [1]:
Rumack: Mr. Striker, the passengers are getting worse. You must land soon.
Ted Striker: Surely there must be something you can do.
Rumack: I'm doing everything I can... and stop calling me Shirley.
Ted Striker: Surely you can't be serious.
Rumack: I am serious... and don't call me Shirley.
Please note that English is not my native tongue so there is always the
possibility that I misunderstood something, or that I express myself badly
and so cause misunderstandings. Is the expression "Surely you meant to say
<whatever>" perceived as offending or arrogant, perhaps? In this case I
would gladly apologize and assure everyone that this was not intended!
Nothing was offensive or arrogant.I just saw it as an opportunity to reference
the joke.
I posted this correction only in order to avoid confusion for the OP, who
described himself as a beginner with regard to Haskell. I didn't mean to be
nitpicking or anything like that. If I have made a mistake, either
technically or by chosing the wrong words, then please tell me so.
Your answer to my other posting today is of a similar nature, i.e.
completely obscure to me, and totally disregarding the essence of my
question. If there is something personal involved here (for which I can't
imagine any reason other than the above mentioned one) maybe it would be
better to clearly say so (and sort this out in private and not on this
list).
I am sorry my other posting was off topic. Sometimes I contribute what occurs
to me instead of what is relevant.
Cheers,
Chris
[1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080339/quotes
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
