Oh, sorry, I thought your version was a rewritten version of mine. :)
The names are so similar, after all.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 02:26 , isto wrote:
Hi,
When writing IO version, I wasn't aware of other twister versions,
and the only reason is/was that it was easiest to me and that I knew
(believed) that plain lists would have been inefficient. I just
wanted
to see and learn, how close to C version this can be made. (And still
do.)
There were some good suggestions on this thread - next I'll try
to get grasp on how to apply the suggestions and do something...
br, Isto
ke, 2006-11-01 kello 22:04 -0500, Lennart Augustsson kirjoitti:
The whole point of writing the Mersenne Twister was that I wanted to
show how a stateful computation could be encapsulated in the ST monad
and none of it showing up outside. This aspect of the code is
totally gone now when everything is in the IO monad. Is there some
good reason to have it in the IO monad?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
