On Tue Nov 7 16:32:11 EST 2006, alex wrote:
> Latency I deal with by calculating everything a second or so ahead of
> time, and timestamping my OSC packets with times in the future. Then on
> the other side I have some scheduling stuff to trigger sounds at the
> right moment, for example in SuperCollider's sclang:
A second seems excessive? Working directly with ghc <-> scsynth
latencies of ~ 0.075 do not seem to be and issue with even relatively
heavy scheduling loads.
> response = {
> arg time, responder, message;
> if (message[1] == 'on',
> {
> SystemClock.sched(time - Date.getDate.rawSeconds,
> {Synth("noisebox",
> [\lgain, message[2] / 100,
> \rgain, message[3] / 100,
> \ts, message[4] / 100,
> \browndel, message[5] / 100,
> \filter, message[6],
> \envtype, message[7]
> ]
> ); nil;
> };
> );
> });
> };
> o = OSCresponder(nil, '/noise', response);
> o.add;
Even sclang, remarkable as it is, will need to be sending time-stamped
bundles for reliable sample-accurate timing? Even to avoid
perceptible jitter under high load?
Regards,
Rohan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
