On Wed, 08 Nov 2006, Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the Prelude would be splitted into modules, where (==) and (+) > are separated, and no module imports the other one, then we need a > third module, which states the relation between (==) and (+).
Yes, presumably. However, currently a fixity declaration for an operator can only be given in the module where the operator is defined. In this hypothetical new system, how would one import/export fixity declarations? Should they be named, or should they be treated like instance declarations are treated today? I've thought about this before, since I like the idea of not totally ordering operator precedences, but I haven't found an elegant and light-weight solution to this problem. -- /NAD _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
