Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm,
>
> 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = ("<pre>"++) . (++"</pre>")
> 14:42 lambdabot> Defined.
> 14:43 dons> > L.top'n'tail "foo me now"
> 14:43 lambdabot> "<pre>foo me now</pre>"
> 14:43 mauke> that reminds me, haskell needs don't
> 14:43 dons> yes!
> 14:44 pkhuong-> mm. the opposite of do, eh? do for comonads? :)
>
> So now a prize to the person who comes up with the best use for the
> identifier:
>
> don't :: ?
>
> -- Don
don't :: IO a -> a
example :: ()
example = don't (do erase "/dev/hda")
Regards,
apfelmus
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
