don't :: a
don't = error "D'oh!"
- marc
Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 04:47 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart:
> As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm,
>
> 14:42 ?let top'n'tail = ("<pre>"++) . (++"</pre>")
> 14:42 lambdabot> Defined.
> 14:43 dons> > L.top'n'tail "foo me now"
> 14:43 lambdabot> "<pre>foo me now</pre>"
> 14:43 mauke> that reminds me, haskell needs don't
> 14:43 dons> yes!
> 14:44 pkhuong-> mm. the opposite of do, eh? do for comonads? :)
>
> So now a prize to the person who comes up with the best use for the
> identifier:
>
> don't :: ?
>
> -- Don
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
