On 12/9/06, Alfonso Acosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/9/06, Udo Stenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You wouldn't need a Typeable context anyway; what's biting you is that
> Dynamic is not one of the primitive types that can pass across the FFI.
> There are good reasons for that and unsafeCoerce certainly cannot
> invalidate them.
>
> You want a StablePtr.
I'm using StablePtrs already, what made you assume I wasn't using them?
How about using a StablePtr to a Dynamic?
--
Cheers,
Lemmih
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
