On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:59:45PM +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Well, that???s a possible implementation of a maybeToM. The question is: > Is it useful enough for a name on it???s own?
...and for putting it in Prelude? It would be interesting to try to estimate the number of functions useful enough for putting in Prelude - I am starting to be afraid that there will be too many of them. One of the nice things about functional languages is that you can create such functions by combining higher-order functions, without the need to name the resulting function. Maybe we could agree to put in Prelude only the N (200? 1000?) most useful functions ;-) I am not sure about maybeToM - maybe it will be found useful to many. Best regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
