Hi,

Hey folks, I'm sure you can all agree :)
Just (if you want to) re-list what you want to say ... each mail is a
step further incomprehension for each participant in this thread
(while I think each position of you is not so different).

It would be a shame if the haskell mailing list ends being a battle ground ;-)

Cia,
minh thu

2006/12/19, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Tomasz,

Tuesday, December 19, 2006, 3:24:36 PM, you wrote:

> in me :-). My statements are not contradictory: Some of the programs I
> was talking about were throw-away programs, for one use, and I would be
> satisfied even if they ran 10x-100x slower than they did, as long as

you was 101st one who wrote this obvious thing



--
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to