On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 07:16:16PM +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote: > About the question, whether functions should be provided in the most > general context, I refer to > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Slim_instance_declaration
Certainly we all agree that a module that defines instances should export functions it uses that others can use in defining further instances, but I don't see the point of this rule as stated. What would we gain if Ratio exported (+) on rationals with a different name? Surely the important thing is the reusable auxiliary functions, if any, since the specialized method itself is available. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
