Hello Diego, Saturday, December 30, 2006, 6:05:46 PM, you wrote:
> Maybe there should be a Comprehensible class that's automatically > mapped to comprehension syntax. It's rather odd to have them only for > lists. That would be both more general and more elegant than just > bringing back monad comprehensions. > Is there any obvious reason why this wouldn't work? "it will make error messages harder to understand for novices", "it will make execution slower", "it will make programs more buggy" - standard list of arguments against making anything in Haskell more polymorphic :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
