On 19/01/07, Yitzchak Gale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, thanks! Time to re-write the "Note" paragraph yet again. Here goes a first shot at it:
This was a bit much to include in the introduction section, so I added a footnote. Hopefully I got everything right; I tend to take the view that we should ignore seq when talking about abstract language properties so if the comment seems biased towards blaming seq, that's why. :) -- -David House, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
