On 26/01/07, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But if I can't write this type signature without -fglasgow-exts, I thought that it couldn't infer this type. For me it's strange that it's ok to have a very generic function if I don't have a type signature, but if I write it the function will not be so generic. Shouldn't it infer only types that could be written?
It doesn't really infer the types of put/get at runtime; it pulls them from the interface file for Control.Monad.State, which _was_ built with -fglasgow-exts. Hence SPJ mentioning that it was more of a UI bug than a typing bug. -- -David House, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
