Hello David,

Friday, January 26, 2007, 6:23:26 PM, you wrote:

>> performance was not very good (the OCaml version I based it on was at
>> least 10x faster).

> I would think that what we'd want to benchmark would be clean, optimized
> actually-used code.  I.e. things like Data.Bytestring, so that we could see

so you propose to benchmark only low-level imperative code? :)

(correct me if i'm wrong, but everything fast i've seen, including FPS,
is just imperative code)

-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to