I agree. If performance is important enough to worry about is shiftl
traverses the list once or twice then it's time to switch to a better
data type.
On Feb 4, 2007, at 19:27 , Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Nicolas Frisby wrote:
I've always thought that when certain operations are of particular
interest, it's time to use more appropriate data structures, right?
Lists are great and simple and intuitive, but if you need such
operations as shifts, something like a deque is the way to go.
This sounds like a job for Data.Sequence.
-Yitz
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
