G'day all. Quoting David House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Surely within a group of related types there'd be no overlapping names > anyway? [...] > I like to prefix my record accessors with three letters that describe > the type. I do pretty much that too, but I wouldn't say that I "like" to do it. You're replacing a namespace system with a naming convention. If you enjoy that sort of thing, you might be happier programming in C. (Sorry, that was unfair.) > I don't really see why anything more complex would be needed. Famous last words. Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
