I originally used a more general approach (probably similar to the one
you refer to), but
kicked generality out in favor of simplicity. In teaching one should
probably just discuss
this aspect, but stay with the simple approach (I'll add a note to the
wiki page :-)). In
contrast, for the real Haskell world such a library would be great. One
could even use
an abstract game specification and compute the corresponding core (if
existing and
computation being feasible according to the complexity of the game).
Two-Player-zero-sum games are very library friendly kinds of games.
However, interesting
"other" games are probably too diverse to be pressed in a general
framework, aren't they?
Henning Thielemann schrieb:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Andrew Wagner wrote:
Steffen,
I've done some chess AI programming in the past, so I'd be happy to
help with this project. I have some pretty fundamental design
suggestions that I'll write up for the wiki page.
As a spin-off, will there grow some library for general strategies in
board games, like those described in "why functional programming matters"?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
