The way roles/traits are described in [1] (and the pages it links to)
make me think of Haskell type classes.  Am I completely off in doing
that?

/M

[1]: 
http://griddlenoise.blogspot.com/2007/05/traits-roles-as-alternative-to-abstract.html

-- 
Magnus Therning                             (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]             Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://therning.org/magnus

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety
     -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

Attachment: pgpAAfGwnpdna.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to