Hi
What is the rationale behind currying? is it for breaking subroutines into pure one-to-one mappings? If f x y = f x -> a function which takes y for argument then does that mean that the second function already has value x, as it were, built into it? The syntax in Haskell is perfectly lucid and almost intuitive; unlike the underlying theory which is a bit ...
top marks for the least jargoned answer.
Many thanks in advance,
Paul

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to