Andrew Coppin wrote: > > OK, can somebody explain to me *really slowly* exactly what the > difference between an existential type and a rank-N type is? > [...] > If you get a chance, I'd recommend reading Types and Programming Languages by Benjamin Pierce. It's an excellent book that builds up to complicated Type acrobatics from the untyped lambda calculus, and most of what's in there (though the implementations are in O'Caml) has a corresponding name in Haskell (plus dreaded extensions :-)). I'm reading it at the moment and needing to frequently backtrack having got completely lost, but it's worth it. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Type-system-madness-tf4051778.html#a11511500 Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
