Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
On 10/07/07, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Both are designed for GUI and web programming, so they don't fare
well for
massive concurrency, high-performance numerics or allocation-intensive
algorithms (e.g. idiomatic functional programming).
C# 3.0 gets it a bit closer, though. I wonder what C# 4.0 will look
like, though I worry about the complexity of the language when they
keep tacking stuff on like that.
The thing that I *like* about Haskell is that it manages to be very
powerful, and yet elegently simple. :-D
(...and then they add MPTCs, GADTs, ATs, ETs, Rank-N polymorphism, FDs...)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
