On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:33:19PM -0500, Jonathan Cast wrote: > On Wednesday 11 July 2007, you wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:59:45PM -0500, Jonathan Cast wrote: > > > One could put up the Haddock doc-comment. Or, say, one could extend > > > Haddock to support parameter names: > > > > > > testunique' :: Eq a > > > => [a] -- ^ $list List of elements to test > > > -> [a] -- ^ $elementssofar List of elements seen thus far > > > -> [a] -- ^ List of unique elements in 'list'. > > > > > > No patch forthcoming from this corner, though. > > > > None necessary! Haddock already supports that syntax. > > > > http://haskell.org/haddock/haddock-html-0.8/ch03s02.html#id289091 > > I think you missed my overloading of the section-label syntax to get argument > names.
Indeed. > And it's not even quite supported; trying the example gets you > > $ haddock -h Foo.hs > Warning: Foo: the following names could not be resolved: > Eq list Uhm... that's a *successful* run. I think you meant to copy the messages from a failed run? Stefan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
