* Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Then, in effect, the "standard library" is all the X packages. I wonder > if it'd help to have some descriptions such as those above (better > worded), and use them? Cabal already has a "stability" indication, and > that might serve, but we'd want to articulate much more clearly what it > meant.
You need an external indicator, not an indicator from the package author. It might be interesting to transform the dependency graph of cabalized packaged at hackage into a ranking indicator. It's like the Google Pagerank: Same benefit, same illness. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
