Miguel Mitrofanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > It reminds me of a paper by Knuth, where he states that >> > "goto" statement is necessary; don't remember the title, >> > however. >> I don't remember needing a goto in Haskell... > > Well, for imperative languages, of course.
I think my point is that it requires a narrow definition of imperative language; you don't need gotos if the other control structures are rich enough¹, imperative or not. [1] the proof of which is, allow first-class functions... -- Jón Fairbairn [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
