Thanks for all the info. It's really good news that code coverage is now part of the GHC compiler!
Any more info on that "deep seq"? I can't find it in the libraries that come with GHC 6.6.1. It seems to be part of Control.Strategies.DeepSeq of HXT. This is a separate download? Intuitively, I would say "deep seq" forces strict evaluation of the complete "graph" of its first argument? Is this correct? Peter -----Original Message----- From: Don Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:11 PM To: Peter Verswyvelen Cc: Neil Mitchell; Haskell-Cafe Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Building "production stable" software in Haskell bf3: > Well, I actually meant more something like the imperative equivalences > of "code coverage tools" and "unit testing tools", because I've read > rumors that in Haskell, unit testing is more difficult because lazy > evaluation will cause the "units" that got tested to be evaluated We have full control over evaluation though, with bang patterns, seq and deep seq. Generally unit testing is generalised to property testing with QuickCheck, though. For code coverage, combined with testing, use HPC, the program coverage tool now in GHC head. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
