I could see it as a useful abstraction instead of directly generating assembly. To me the idea behind llvm seems nice and clean and academic to a certain degree. It can see it as something to look out for in the future.
On 9/13/07, brad clawsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > has anyone ever considered using llvm as a infrastructure for haskell > compilation? it wold seem people are looking at building frontends for > scheme, ocaml, etc. i don't know if an alternate backend is > appropriate, but it would seem to be an interesting way to aggregate > the best thinking for various optimizations over a more diverse group > of developers. > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
